Following our swap from an i40 Tourer to an equivalent saloon model, it seemed fitting to compare the two on a costs basis.

Running a comparison of the two on our KwikCarcost database revealed that there’s actually very little in it. The biggest disparity is in the P11D values, which weigh in at £21,240 for the saloon and £22,490 for the Tourer. There’s virtually nothing in the RVs at 33.3% and 33.7% respectively, while cost per mile works out at 49.2p and 50.9p – an equally paltry amount.

The reality of it is that you’re looking at an extra £1250 for the estate, but beyond that all the

other running costs are nigh on identical. Hyundai claims identical emissions and economy for the pair, so whether there’s any disparity on those figures in real-world driving remains to be seen.

With the running costs as close as they are, there’s an argument either way for the larger model. Why pay extra when you can have the same thing for less? Or should you spend a modest amount extra and get more car for your money?

Hyundai i40 Tourer 1.7 CRDi
136 Blue Drive Style
Mileage 13,097
Claimed combined
consumption
62.8mpg
Our average
consumption
45.1mpg
Forecast CPM 50.9p
Actual CPM 53.1p
For Great value as upper
medium models go
Against £1250 estate levy over
saloon is a bit high
Why we’re running it Is Hyundai’s first
fleet-specific model
as good to live with
as it’s claimed to be?